Showing posts with label Route 34. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Route 34. Show all posts

Friday, August 1, 2008

Route 34 and Hospital Projects Update

So far, there has been no public response on the community's letter to Governor Rell regarding the removal of Route 34. DNH readers say that supporters of the coalition are beginning to wonder when they can expect to hear a response from the DOT and whether technical issues surrounding the I-95/I-91 interchange project, currently awaiting construction, may prevent the boulevardization project from being realized in the most effective way.

Meanwhile, an article in the Commercial Record describing the western half of Route 34's development is excerpted below. In many people's opinion, the success of this area will largely hinge on whether Route 34 can be converted into a walkable district, rather than its current configuration of one-way streets in each direction which tend to very high traffic speeds and noise (and, along with the adjacent Boulevard, are therefore highly unpleasant and unsafe areas to walk in).

Over time, the entirety of Route 34 would benefit greatly from comprehensive urban design and community placemaking studies that could help designate the kinds of key community gathering areas, pedestrian refuges, hierarchies of streets and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity (such as a linear park), diversity of uses and neighborhood landmarks that all great urban districts depend upon. Without a more detailed framework for the area's development, the Route 34 district could eventually end up looking like one long office park rather than a vibrant urban neighborhood that closely relates to the Downtown, Dwight and Hill neighborhoods.

Also see here for a related article on "boulevardization" projects nationwide, by New Haven's Phil Langdon, in this month's New Urban News.

New Haven Hospital Projects May Heal City’s Route 34 Rift
Commercial Record (Boston), May 16, 2008, By Jeff Haynes, Reporter

The so-called connector route was anything but. After decades of division created by New Haven’s Route 34, efforts to start punching through pedestrian links between downtown and the Yale-New Haven Hospital are coming. Two mixed-use developments ready to break ground have the city’s residents, planners and real estate professionals waiting to see if the trend will move westward, bridging the gap the connector route filled with heavy traffic and vacant land.

Separated by a block, the two developments along Route 34 will serve the hospital in different ways. The $40 million Park Street building, with its groundbreaking scheduled for May 27, is designed to provide laboratory and support space to the hospital. A little farther west, Boston-based Intercontinental Real Estate Corp. is slated to break ground in September for a mixed-use project that will include an 845-unit parking garage for the hospital.

But it’s the other functions of those sites that have everyone watching.

“Urbanistically, [the Park Street building] is a linking piece,” said Barry Svigals, of New Haven architectural firm
Svigals & Partners. His firm and Behnisch Architects of California designed the building. The structure is intended to connect pedestrians to the Air Rights garage, the street, and Yale-New Haven’s $470 million Smilow Cancer Hospital, now under construction.

To help draw in people, the Park Street space includes retail – “things that will involve activating the street,” Svigals said. “There is an atrium – a public atrium – that people will be able to walk through and go to the shops down in the lower level.”

The Intercontinental project plans include 57,000 square feet of office space, 15,560 square feet of ground-floor retail and 29 residential housing units in a “wrap” structure around the garage. The housing component is something residents on both sides of Route 34 have been seeking in hopes that new housing will help recreate neighborhood ties severed long ago by the highway.

Getting the housing units included in the plan took some negotiating, however, as the hospital’s original proposal for the site was a 1,400-car garage.

“So while 29 units may sound like a small number of residential units for a whole city block, we’re very pleased that we were able to convince the hospital to reduce the size of the garage to 845 [spaces] and include these other uses on the block,” said Karyn Gilvarg, executive director of city’s planning department. “We think they are key to healing this gap between the neighborhood that has been there for 40 years.”

The mixed-use style is consistent with redevelopment plans for the area drawn up two years ago, in part by Svigals and Maura Cochran, chairwoman and chief executive officer of Hartford-based Bartram & Cochran, which specializes in adaptive reuse of functionally obsolete properties.

“Part of the plan was to take the area closest to [the hospital] and make it a garage with a facade of residential [uses], putting retail on the first floor,” Cochran said. “There was also a strong need for retail. The retail market right around the hospital is – no surprise – the strongest in the area. You have both the commuters and all the people coming to Yale. So it could support new development.”

.... more high-density, mixed-use developments could be coming, depending on the success of the Intercontinental project.

“I think it’s a big factor,” Gilvarg said. “The [neighboring] Pfizer development was, to a great deal, driven by the state Department of Economic and Community Development. So to my mind, they let Pfizer get away with building a 3-story building and surface parking. And we need much denser development in this area.”

“Hopefully the next site, the balance goes the other way [toward] the commercial, the retail and the residential uses,” she added.

The broker community feels the same way.

“For us, that’s 20 to 25 acres of prospective retail and commercial space,” said Rich Guralnick, senior commercial broker for North Haven-based H. Pearce Commercial Real Estate. “My guess is that is going to ultimately wind up being a good mix of medical office and retail.”

In addition to its proximity to the Yale-New Haven Hospital, the land also is close to the St. Raphael Hospital.

“We’re in unbelievable proximity to both the major hospitals in the city,” Guralnick said.

A lot of the area doctors are now located in offices that are either converted older homes or outdated medical buildings, he said, so “there’s a pent up demand both from Yale-New Haven and St. Raphael for doctors to have their private practices in close proximity to the hospital.”

Whatever development goes in likely will have a residential component, too, he said. “I think there’s going to be a demand for residential and affordable housing in that strip as part of the mixed use,” Guralnick said.

For Svigals, the development potential is there.

“With the hospital and the medical school on one side of this connector and the city on the other, you have two very strong generators that will easily fill in that space in between,” Svigals said. “There are two concepts here. One is a stepping stone concept that if you can create – without having to do an entire redevelopment – if you can begin to build upon what’s there and create stepping stones from one place to another, that’s one concept.”

“The other that’s really important is that any urban development has to be synergistic,” Svigals said. “There is no independent piece that can solve an urban problem. You need to be firing on absolutely every cylinder in concert.”

.... “Mixed use is really where the trend has been – how to recapture what got sent out to the suburbs in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s with the urban mall spread,” Guralnick said. “Everyone is coming back into the city. So this is a fun opportunity for the city of New Haven to recapture and reposition itself against suburban sprawl.”

According to Gilvarg, the redevelopment of the lots will be concrete evidence of progress.

“When that starts to happen, I think people will recognize that within five years, two blocks will have been redeveloped after 40 or 50 years of nothing,” Gilvarg said.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Citywide Petition for Safe, Livable Streets

Original post, 5/24/08: Numerous studies have shown that safe, livable, walkable streets that encourage a sense of community are absolutely essential for cities that wish to promote public health, economic development, alternative forms of transport, the environment and social equity.

A citywide "petition for safe streets" -- which, among many other specific measures, calls for strict 15-20MPH speed limits in areas with dense concentrations of pedestrians like some of those surrounding Route 34 -- is being sponsored by a number of community groups, organizations and elected officials in New Haven. The petition may be viewed here. The document will be used to lobby for major change at the local and state level. Please feel free to circulate.

Update 5/27/08: A new umbrella website for the safe streets coalition has now been launched.

Update 5/29/08: An informational post from the Downtown-Wooster Square Community Management Team listserv:

The coalition for safe streets has many goals, which might be summarized as three distinct components:

1) Immediately reducing the number of deaths and injuries on our streets by 50% by 2009 and 90% by 2015. Virtually all of these are preventable. The number of New Haven residents currently being injured on our streets is ethically unacceptable, particularly when one considers that fewer than 30% of injuries are even ever reported to the hospital, and fewer than 1% to the news media -- even though almost all of us have had friends or relatives killed or permanently disabled in traffic incidents. By supporting the petition, New Haven is signaling that it absolutely and unequivocally can not and does not accept the current situation on our streets.

2) Raising education and awareness about the issue of traffic safety among the entire community, so that citizens can take preventative measures to ensure their own safety, mobilize around the issue and work for long-term changes that will benefit their neighborhoods, their health and their overall well-being. That includes protecting their property values -- would you want to move to a place where oil trucks were speeding down the road in front of your kid's school at 50MPH? It is happening here already -- see the New Haven Register article posted at http://www.newhavensafestreets.org. Long-term changes will require engineering, education, enforcement, planning/ public evaluation and legislative change. Those of you who follow progress in Hartford realize that our legislators are already listening and making some positive changes. As Doug points out, there are many pieces of the puzzle, which no single petition or master plan could ever fully address. As such, one of the specific requests of the petition is a quarterly public report on enforcement actions and traffic incidents by neighborhood, and an annual public evaluation of the city's progress on traffic safety, so that each community can better understand what is happening around them, and respond in ways that solve the problem. We are not minimizing the great work that communities and the police have done already, but it is clear from talking with such groups across the city that much more is needed.

3) Building political capital for change at the local, regional and state levels. Even though the economic development, transport efficiency, public health, social and environmental benefits of livable, safe streets have been widely and very precisely understood for decades, many cities are only just beginning to take vigorous action to implement them. If New Haven and other dense urban centers in Connecticut do not catch up with what these other cities, states and countries are currently doing, we will be forever fighting an uphill battle to compete with them (many would say that in some ways, we are already competing with our neighboring towns - on Sunday, I traveled through over 20 towns in Connecticut, all of which had pedestrian crosswalk markers except New Haven). Those concerned with the long-term economic health of our beautiful city, or even just the short-term health of their own bank accounts, literally can not afford to continue to accept the status quo on this issue.

Update 6/19/08: NHI reports (photo above) on canvassers taking to the New Haven Green and Medical Center area, educating residents about traffic safety concerns and collecting hundreds of signatures. A majority of the New Haven Board of Aldermen and neighborhood police district community management teams (CMTs), including the Downtown-Wooster Square CMT, have now signed on and support the petition. Check the coalition website for further updates.

"There is an incredible momentum on this issue. I hope everyone gets on the bandwagon and does something positive,” said Mary Faulkner, chairwoman of the Westville management group. She said traffic calming measures not only increase pedestrian safety, they enhance economic development and actually move traffic more efficiently. “We have to have more say in how our streets are designed,” Faulkner said.

Update 7/30/08: East Rock becomes the 10th of 12th New Haven Community Management Teams to vote in support of the petition. The city's two remaining neighborhoods, Dwight and Dixwell (DECMT), are expected to discuss and/or vote on the petition when they reconvene after summer break (the item has already been presented to the DECMT). In related events, one of the petition supporters, the Coalition for a Livable Whalley, along with Senator Toni Harp and Representative Pat Dillon, has recently brought up concerns about the DOT's plan to widen Whalley Avenue. DNH hears that the road is currently being designed with a "design speed" of about 40mph -- appropriate for a suburban highway, perhaps, but definitely not for a road that cuts through a vibrant and densely-populated urban neighborhood.

Friday, June 6, 2008

Coalition: Remove Route 34 Relic, Rell!

Following last March's open civic forum with John Norquist, a coalition of businesses, community organizations and nonprofit groups has delivered a letter to Governor Jodi Rell's desk requesting the removal of the remainder of Downtown New Haven's Route 34 connector highway -- a completely unnecessary and dangerous relic of 1950s traffic planning -- in accordance with the City of New Haven's longstanding plan to redevelop the area as a mixed-use, tax-generating, pedestrian-friendly, transit-oriented development that expands the downtown. The New Haven Register also wrote an excellent masthead editorial in favor of the proposal.

Momentum for the plan is building. Even without considering the benefit the city would receive by having acres of downtown land next to Union Station available for future development (and greatly increasing the value of the development already in this area -- might a TIF be used to pay for a portion of this?), the removal of this "stub" highway would save money in the long term by reducing maintenance costs on the amount of road infrastructure in the corridor. Might the next step include a community design charrette?

The text of the letter appears below:

May 27, 2008

Governor M. Jodi Rell
Office of the Governor
State Capitol
210 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106

RE: Removal of Route 34 in New Haven

Dear Governor Rell:

We write today as a broad coalition of community leaders, non-profit policy organizations, businesses and local elected officials to strongly urge you to support the removal of New Haven’s Route 34 connector.

Route 34, a six lane highway which runs from I-95 to the Air Rights Garage, bisects the City of New Haven, inhibiting its growth and revitalization and creating a dangerous situation for pedestrians. The highway is underused and even during rush hours does not experience significant traffic. The City of New Haven has an ambitious vision to remove the highway, recreate the street grid, and develop housing, parks, and offices in the highway’s place. We support the vision, and write to ask you to take a leadership role in helping the City and community bring the project to fruition.

There is substantial public support for the proposal. Last month the Tri-State Transportation Campaign hosted a public event in support of highway’s removal. The event, headlined by John Norquist, President and CEO of the Congress for the New Urbanism and former Mayor of Milwaukee, was attended by over 125 community members, elected officials and activists. During his tenure as Mayor, Mr. Norquist oversaw a similar project to remove the Park East Freeway, a project which has created millions of dollars in downtown investment.

The removal of Route 34 fits seamlessly into your efforts for more responsible growth and transit oriented development throughout Connecticut. The more vibrant and livable our urban centers, the more likely new and current residents will choose to reside in those areas. And by focusing growth on our cities, we are more likely to protect existing open space in rural areas.

We ask that you support the removal of Route 34, and dedicate state support towards implementing the community's plan.

Sincerely, (in alphabetical order)

Mark Abraham, Member, Elm City Cycling
Robert Alpern, Dean, Yale School of Medicine
Tokunbo Anifalaje, West River, New Haven, Resident
Nate Bixby, President, Network for a Sustainable New Haven
Lynne Bonnett, Chairwoman, New Haven Environmental Network
Frances T. Clark, Alderwoman, Ward 7, New Haven
Reverend Kevin G. Ewing, President, West River Neighborhood Services Corp.
Anstress Farwell, Executive Director, New Haven Urban Design League
Norman Garrick, Ph. D, Associate Professor and Director, Connecticut Transportation Institute, UCONN-School of Engineering
Florita Gillespie, Chairperson, Dwight Community Management Team
Scott C. Healy, Executive Director, Town Green Special Services District
David Kooris, Director, Connecticut Office, Regional Plan Association
Philip Langdon, President, Ronan-Edgehill Neighborhood Assoc.
Robert Orr, Partner, Robert Orr & Associates LLC
Christopher Ozyck, Greenway and Community Advocate
Jonathan Romanyshyn, Member, Yale Medical Area Traffic Safety Group
Kate Slevin, Executive Director, Tri-State Transportation Campaign
Don Strait, Executive Director, Connecticut Fund for the Environment
Erin Sturgis-Pascale, Alderwoman, Ward 14, New Haven
Carter Winstanley, Partner, Winstanley Enterprises, LLC

Cc: ConnDOT Commissioner Joseph F. Marie, ConnDOT Deputy Commissioner Albert Martin, State Senator Toni Harp, State Senator Martin Looney, State Representative Patricia Dillon, State Representative Toni Edmonds Walker, State Representative William R. Dyson, State Representative Juan Candelaria, State Representative Cameron Staples, State Representative Robert Megna

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Walking Businesses to Downtown New Haven

In an interview published in this past week's issue of Business New Haven, the city's new EDC Chief Michele (yes, with one "l" in Michele) L. Whelley outlines her strategy for attracting new business to Downtown New Haven. It sounds like Whelley has read some of the Brookings Institution's reports and studies on the urgent need for more walkable cities:

"So more and more of our institutions are recognizing [location] decisions that are being made by top talent - faculty, doctors, researchers and also students are [driven by] lifestyle [preferences] and where they want to be.... what you sell is the urban environment, which for some companies is a huge plus. The lifestyle, the walkability, resources and facilities.... [Technology companies need] to locate near one another, not necessarily in one building but near enough that there is a sense of community and collaboration. And they have to be able to hire the talent they need, and that circles back to lifestyle."
Downtown New Haven has made major strides in terms of walkability, becoming the most vibrant, walkable place between Boston and New York (and was recently named one of the 20 most walkable cities in the United States). Promoting bicycling and walking is critical to economic development, not only because of "lifestyle" and density preferences, but also because the massive amount of money typically spent on automobile operation gets redirected locally instead of sent offshore. These forms of transportation will grow increasingly important as gas prices continue to rise.

Michele Whelley implies that if the state wishes to compete more effectively in the global economy and attract new residents and businesses, it needs to begin paying even closer attention to promoting transit-oriented development, true pedestrian-friendly streetscapes and "livable" streets, improved multi-modal transit, more frequent mass transit, geographically dense business clusters and urban infill opportunities in key urban centers like New Haven. The city will also need more urgent regional and state support for projects such as the rebuilding of the Route 34 corridor, the mixed-use development at Union Station and other long-term changes to the Downtown.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

New Website: New Haven Safe Streets

"New Haven Safe Streets is a coalition of various organizations and individuals advocating for streets that are safer and therefore more livable, walkable, economically viable and environmentally sound."

Update 5/28/08: An article about the safety coalition, with quotes from sponsors including Senator Toni Harp and Alderwoman Erin Sturgis-Pascale, appears in today's New Haven Register. Also, a TV news item appeared on WSFB news today. Tri-State Transportation Campaign's blog also features a post on the petition.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Downtown Traffic Safety Event and Ride of Silence

All are invited to "Traffic Safety in Our Community," an event being held by the community this Thursday in memory of Mila Rainof.

  • Thursday, May 22nd
  • 4 to 5:30 pm
  • Fitkin Amphitheater, 330 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT
  • Speakers include Dr. Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS, Chief of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Surgical Emergencies, Yale University School of Medicine and Michael Piscitelli, AICP, Director, New Haven Dept. of Transportation, Traffic and Parking.
For background information, see this post or join the Yale Traffic Safety Group email list here.

Update 5/20/08: On Wednesday, May 21st, at 7PM there will be a nationwide "Ride of Silence" to commemorate those injured or killed in traffic accidents over the past year. New Haven's silent bicycle ride leaves from the flagpole on the New Haven Green, and will be slow-paced and appropriate for all skill levels and age groups.

Update 5/23/08: New Haven Independent post-event coverage, and valuable information on what to do next, posted here. New Haven Register coverage here.

Update 5/29/08: The Yale Traffic Safety Group is one of the sponsors of the new citywide petition for safe streets.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Updated: Pedestrian fatality highlights safety issues on Route 34 near Yale-New Haven Hospital

Mila Rainof, 27, was killed over the weekend of April 19-20 in a traffic incident near Yale-New Haven Hospital. Discussion continues today on the ElmCityCycling listserv and the Yale Daily News article comments about how to make the Route 34 & Frontage Road area a safer place for pedestrians.

Erica writes: "Mila was one of the warmest people I've ever met, and she was about to graduate and go into emergency medicine. ... Why do we continue to let this happen and call motor vehicle accidents "accidents"? Why don't people know and talk about all these "accidents"?

One anonymous commentor writes: "If it is found that the driver of the sports car was traveling even 1MPH above the posted speed limit, he or she should be tried for murder and sent to prison for 20 years. We need to rigorously enforce the speed limit, and one way to do that is to try speeders as felons if they kill or injure anyone while speeding."

Tom writes: "This is unacceptable. Despite the mounting number of fatalities, the NHPD continues to ignore traffic violations throughout the city. How many people have to be killed before the police decide that this is a problem? In collisions involving pedestrians, once vehicle speeds exceed 20 mph, the odds of a fatality increase exponentially. The speed limit in downtown needs to be reduced to 20 mph and the police need to enforce the traffic laws."

Anonymous writes: "Sweden has adopted a plan called Vision Zero which is taking steps to ensure that zero, imagine that - zero! - people will die in motor vehicle fatalities in 2020. ... why can't we adopt a Vision Zero for Connecticut? Traffic accidents are not a force of nature - even when no particular actor is "at fault", as here, there are ways of preventing the accidents: safer crosswalks, better traffic enforcement, speed bumps etc. etc. Take a look: the Connecticut General Assembly has taken a look at Sweden's Vision Zero and came up with this report... Let's get our state behind this. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-R-0635.htm "

Because Route 34 is a major road, cars frequently exceed the posted speed limits. Another comment on ElmCityCycling notes that a 2006 petition with 646 signatures calling for pedestrian safety in this area has largely been ignored so far, a fact that the YDN highlights in an article today about the intersection. Could the situation be improved through traffic calming?

Coverage and discussion also continues in the New Haven Independent, Student Doctor Network forum, Hartford Courant, and elsewhere.

Update 4/30/08: An op-ed piece written by three members of ElmCityCycling about traffic safety and the Swedish "Vision Zero" program, "Why Tolerate 42,000 Traffic Deaths A Year?", appears in today's Hartford Courant. On a related note, about 30 members of the community met on Monday at the Yale Medical School, and are beginning to mobilize a response to the situation. Coverage of that meeting appears here and the first set of meeting minutes was posted on the ElmCityCycling listserv.
Update 5/19/08: A community traffic safety event will be held on May 22. Details here.
Update 6/3/08: The Yale Medical Traffic Safety Group is a member of the New Haven Safe Streets coalition.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

New Haven Register: Reclaim Route 34

A thoughtful masthead editorial from today's New Haven Register, supporting the plan to reclaim Route 34 for urban development:

Reclaim Route 34 for downtown (New Haven Register editorial 4/20/08)

There is no need for the Route 34 connector that funnels interstate traffic into the heart of downtown New Haven. The sunken roadway creates a dead end for downtown, gobbles up land that could be developed and doesn’t even serve the purpose for which it was built. The connector was built in 1959 as the first section of a highway that was to have extended to Route 8 in Derby. Instead, it stops abruptly at the Air Rights Garage.

The idea of reclaiming this land, which once was full of homes and businesses, has been slowly gaining support since New Haven’s quick, initial 2005 study of its feasibility. The city has estimated that development of the highway land could add almost $3.8 million in tax revenue.


A far more detailed study done by consultants for the South Central Connecticut Regional Council of Governments was completed in October. That study, done at the city’s request, has formed the basis of preliminary discussions with the state Department of Transportation. The study estimated that the land could support 1.4 million square feet of midrise buildings for commercial, residential and retail use.

Last week, the discussion of Route 34’s future was energized by a public meeting and discussions here led by John Norquist, the former mayor of Milwaukee, who oversaw the demolition of a freeway spur in his city and its replacement with city streets.

Milwaukee is one of several U.S. cities that have replaced freeways with streets. Portland, Ore., tore down the Harbor Drive Freeway that once carried 90,000 vehicles a day. The Central Freeway in San Francisco, on which 93,000 vehicles traveled daily, was replaced by a boulevard. In comparison, about 75,000 vehicles a day use the Route 34 connector.

What happens to that traffic? According to Norquist, who is president of the Congress for the New Urbanism, it is absorbed into the restored street grid. In New Haven’s case, instead of the connector’s three exits, drivers could choose from all the city streets that now end where the highway cuts them off.

Norquist also widened the discussion. Much of the talk here has centered on a broad boulevard that would extend from roughly Church or Orange Street to the Air Rights Garage. He noted that Milwaukee replaced its highway with a two-way street with sidewalks and parking. He also suggested that all of the connector be reclaimed, right up to where Interstates 95 and 91 connect to Route 34 next to Water Street.

Albert A. Martin, the new state deputy transportation commissioner for transit-oriented development, attended the meetings here. Although the DOT has yet to be convinced of the Route 34 plan, he agreed “there is a need for change.” State support may hinge, in part, on how reclaiming Route 34’s land will support alternatives to automobile use, from the provision of bike lanes and the construction of housing within walking distance of work to how a new street plan connects to the nearby rail stations on Union Avenue and State Street.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Public Event: Re-creating a Community from the Oak Street Connector (Route 34)

Please join the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, the New Haven Urban Design League, ConnDOT Deputy Commissioner Albert Martin and City of New Haven Economic Development Administrator Kelly Murphy to learn more about the City of New Haven’s plan for turning Route 34’s road to nowhere into a neighborhood of workforce housing, retail and open space. Featured speaker, John Norquist, will show how this can be done. Mr. Norquist, president of the Congress for the New Urbanism, and former Mayor of Milwaukee will discuss how Milwaukee tore down the elevated Park East Freeway and created a vibrant community in its place.

Where: Career High School, 140 Legion Avenue in New Haven’s Hill Neighborhood
When: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 from 6:00 to 8:00pm

Feel free to post observations, design ideas, essays, photos and neighborhood commentary here (anonymous or credited), either by adding to the comments or sending items to downtownnewhaven [at] gmail.com.

New Haven Register post-event coverage here, New Haven Independent here.

See this article, "Death of a Neighborhood," in Mother Jones magazine for some background on the Route 34 Corridor and the neighborhood that was lost when it was built.

Update 6/6/08: A letter in favor of the removal of the Route 34 stub highway, signed by a broad coalition of community leaders, activists, organizations and others, has been delivered to Governor Rell.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

CT Smart Growth highlights DNH and Route 34

Connecticut Smart Growth is an excellent blog for smart growth advocates in our state. Topics include brownfields, downtown redevelopment, responsible land use policy, and transportation. Visit their front-page post highlighting Design New Haven, and discussing the redevelopment of the Route 34 corridor, at http://www.ctsmartgrowth.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=173.

CTsmartgrowth points out that "more than 600 businesses and families (some of whom still gather at the annual Oak Street Reunion) were displaced to make way for the Rt. 34 Connector."

If you are interested in learning more about smart growth in Connecticut, also take a look at http://www.1000friends-ct.org/.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Greater Greater Washington looks to New Haven

They seem to support the idea of boulevardizing Route 34. "New Haven next to boulevardize a freeway": http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post.cgi?id=734

Thursday, March 20, 2008

City's Future Framework Plan for Downtown New Haven and Route 34

From CityofNewHaven.com

http://www.cityofnewhaven.com/Government/pdfs/Future%20Framework%202008v9.pdf

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Route 34 study presented to public at City Hall (2007)

The Route 34 Study authors gave a public presentation in June 2007. New Haven City Plan and its consultants brought up that the reconfiguration of Route 34 would make the city more walkable. Concerns were raised about how bicycle-friendly the new development would be, and whether or not traffic would be calmed to an appropriate extent. See coverage by the New Haven Independent here: http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2007/06/what_will_happe.php

Saturday, March 1, 2008

Mayor's plan for Route 34 presented at Edgewood School

The Mayor presented to a group of about 40 neighborhood residents in New Haven. Questions included how to improve urban connectivity and how to make New Haven more bicycle-friendly. See this article for New Haven Independent coverage: http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2008/02/highways_r_us.php

Blog Archive

Subscribe to our feed

Tech Stuff

Add to Technorati Favorites